Stage Analysis Forum - Trading & Investing using Stan Weinstein's Stocks Breakout method
Stan Weinstein's Stage Analysis and Market Breadth - Technical Analysis - Printable Version

+- Stage Analysis Forum - Trading & Investing using Stan Weinstein's Stocks Breakout method (https://www.stageanalysis.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Main Board (https://www.stageanalysis.net/forum/Forum-Main-Board)
+--- Forum: Stan Weinstein's Stage Analysis - Stock Charts, Technical Analysis, Learn to Trade, Stocks, ETF, NYSE, Nasdaq (https://www.stageanalysis.net/forum/Forum-Stan-Weinstein-s-Stage-Analysis-Stock-Charts-Technical-Analysis-Learn-to-Trade-Stocks-ETF-NYSE-Nasdaq)
+--- Thread: Stan Weinstein's Stage Analysis and Market Breadth - Technical Analysis (/Thread-Stan-Weinstein-s-Stage-Analysis-and-Market-Breadth-Technical-Analysis)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484


RE: Stan Weinstein's Stage Analysis and Market Breadth - Technical Analysis - pcabc - 2020-08-22

(2020-08-20, 07:35 PM)the_manassa_mauler Wrote: I had a couple of ques. re your sector breadth bar chart:
Sorry for not getting back earlier, I've had othr stuff on for a few days.


Quote:- is this something you are putting together or does a service publish these weekly?

It is something I produce myself, for myself but sometimes post here in case it is of interest to others. I suggest taking it with a pinch of salt, or perhaps a whole lorry load as I cannot make any promises that it is error free. I have a database of stock data and I break it down into sectors etc and carry out various calculations on it to calculate the breadth. I thought sector charts would give a little more oversight than just the full market.

Quote:- I'm confused how to read it. For ex., industrials has  a green long score, but it also has a LT sell red long position. That seems in contradiction. Why do they conflict when they are both long views?

I see your point. Perhaps I've not used the best terminology. I think 'Long position' is perhaps an error that should be corrected. I think it is best to describe, in very general terms, what I am doing. I calculate breadth data, advance / decline line etc and use various calculations which I characterized by very short, short medium and long breadth scores based on the time periods used in their calculations. The Overall, and errantly labelled 'Long Position' is a sort of consensus score based on the very short, short medium and long term scores. This is all fairly ad-hoc. The overall scores are as follows:
* Green/buy - breadth scores positive / increasing in all time periods - consider buying.
* Grey/hold - indeterminate. Generally do nothing (of couse check stops)
* Yellow/ ST Hold/Sell - Breadth has generally worsened in the time periods but not necessarily terrible. Consider selling positions, tightening stops on shorter term positions.
* Red/LT Sell - consider selling or tightening stops on longer term positions.
* Black or Brown - these are special cases that were derived from looking at warning signs before recent events, the 1987 crash etc. This is quite tricky to engineer something that is reliable and does not give false posatives.

I can't say I've had massive success, I moved down this route end of last year after the markets had gone sideways for a while and I was starting to see results just as the crash came in. So I'd not take what I have done too seriously, but it might be interesting to compare with others. Of course, you should do your own breadth research to ensure you have your own view.

Really what the sector breadth means is whether this sector is a good one to look at, or whether it might be best to shy away from it right now.


Quote:- I'm also confused about healthcare. It got a very short & long run green breadth score. yet short & medium are red. Does that mean its a buy now & looks good long but riskier in a medium hold?

I think you are reading too much into this as it is a fairly ad-hoc scheme that I've created. For the very short term and short term indicators for example I was using the MACD of the advance decline line and the advancing declining volume, for example. The very short term score was based on the histogram of the MACD and the short term on the MACD being above the signal line. I'm assuming that you know what a MACD is, if not there are excellent resources elsewhere. I've tweaked things more recently, so it may be a little different to that now.

The way I have intended to use this is to buy only when all the time periods are positive as that hopefully means you have best chance of a stock that will move in a positive direction. Be warned though, I'm not sure how good I am at practicing what I preach.


Quote:- on the momentum table, for the tech spdr etf what does the 70 fifty MA mean vs a 44 one hundred fifty MA mean % wise?

These are probably dumb questions, but I'm very interested in measuring and trying to time sectors. So this interests me a lot. any help would be appreciate, thanks.

On the momentum table I'm calculating the slope of the 50 day and 150 day simple moving averages and then converting that figure into a per annum basis, e.g. what % increase if the slope were a year long straight line. I sort the data based on those annualized slopes.

There are not dumb questions. I think the best thing to do is to plot the sector charts side by side with their 50 and 150 day SMAs, that would give you a lot of information. Also, if you are in a position to plot there relative strengths to each other, or an index, that is useful.


RE: Stan Weinstein's Stage Analysis and Market Breadth - Technical Analysis - pcabc - 2020-08-22

Sector breadth

US:
   

US sector momentum
   


UK:
   


Commodities:
   


RE: Stan Weinstein's Stage Analysis and Market Breadth - Technical Analysis - pcabc - 2020-08-22

Observations on the S&P500 / Russell 3000 (approximately)

A few things I've noticed from my own breadth calcs:
   

1. Weinstein momentum is headed for the zero line.
2 & 3, McClellan oscillators are quite negative, not been this negative for a couple of months.
4. Number of stocks above their 50 day SME is taking a dive, but is still above 50%.
6. Number of stocks above their 200 day MA has just dipped down below 50%, basically seemed to have bounced off of this value.

I wonder if the same is true with NYSE data?


RE: Stan Weinstein's Stage Analysis and Market Breadth - Technical Analysis - pcabc - 2020-08-26

My breadth chart for the major pharmaceuticals is showing a deterioration in breadth from my scoring system. Whether that is meaningful is debatable, but breadth is not as strong as it was:

   


RE: Stan Weinstein's Stage Analysis and Market Breadth - Technical Analysis - pcabc - 2020-08-27

Looking at last night's data I've had similar warnings about deteriorating breadth from MSCI Europe versus XETRA and the UK construction and materials sector.  A bit of a mixed bag though as breadth on the NASDAQ 100 and its breadth (on the top 100 companies, so limited) is positive, as is silver, US Tech sector, UK Equity investment instruments and UK Electronic and Electrical Engineers.  Caution needed with that last one owing to it being based on very few companies.

A bit of a mixed picture here then.  Not supposed to be a balanced overview, but showing the best and worst.
           
           

Edit: On further inspection I think that a number of indicators are so near zero lines, specific levels etc that they could easily flip multiple ways. Still, always uefull to look at the charts.


RE: Stan Weinstein's Stage Analysis and Market Breadth - Technical Analysis - pcabc - 2020-08-29

Sector Breadth

US sectors:
   

Momentum:
   

UK Sectors:
   

Commodities:
   


RE: Stan Weinstein's Stage Analysis and Market Breadth - Technical Analysis - pcabc - 2020-08-29

US Sector charts:
           
           
           
   


RE: Stan Weinstein's Stage Analysis and Market Breadth - Technical Analysis - grbaNT - 2020-08-30

Attached are the updated charts of the RABWDB Indicator, Individual Phases, SP500 RABWDB, SP400 RABWDB and SP600 RABWDB.

To learn more about the indicator go to https://dg-swingtrading.blogspot.com/search/label/RABWDB