Stage Analysis Forum - Trading & Investing using Stan Weinstein's Stocks Breakout method
Stan Weinstein's Stage Analysis and Market Breadth - Technical Analysis - Printable Version

+- Stage Analysis Forum - Trading & Investing using Stan Weinstein's Stocks Breakout method (https://www.stageanalysis.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Main Board (https://www.stageanalysis.net/forum/Forum-Main-Board)
+--- Forum: Stan Weinstein's Stage Analysis - Stock Charts, Technical Analysis, Learn to Trade, Stocks, ETF, NYSE, Nasdaq (https://www.stageanalysis.net/forum/Forum-Stan-Weinstein-s-Stage-Analysis-Stock-Charts-Technical-Analysis-Learn-to-Trade-Stocks-ETF-NYSE-Nasdaq)
+--- Thread: Stan Weinstein's Stage Analysis and Market Breadth - Technical Analysis (/Thread-Stan-Weinstein-s-Stage-Analysis-and-Market-Breadth-Technical-Analysis)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484


RE: Stan Weinstein's Stage Analysis and Market Breadth - Technical Analysis - pcabc - 2020-03-21

Looking back at 1987 - 1991

I've zoomed in on my previous 20+ year breath chart to this period to see if the danger indications were false alarms that would whipsaw me out of investor positions - with the inherent cost implications, or whether they were good indications to get out.
   
Note, no new highs minus new lows data for this date.

1.  Not apparent on this scale, but two weeks notice before the drop.  Excellent.

2. The temptation, as we know what happened in October, is to state that this is a valid forewarning. It triggered after an initial price drop. Weinstein Momentum is flatish after a fall and slight recovery, % above the 200 day EMA is in the bullish area but has dipped from overbought (> 70%).  To soon to know that price and the a/d line would diverge, the a/d line had not yet failed to make a higher high.  Likely a reasonable call based on information presented. 

3, 4 & 5.  Index was going sideways at 4 & 5.  Was 3 a good indication of that to come or a false alarm?  The danger here is that these could just be artifacts of the calculations if you look closely at the Weinstein momentum perhaps the averages are not true at this point?

6, 7 & 8. The alert occurs on the day, i.e. after the end of day data has been collected on a 6% pullback, which is noteworthy in itself.  7 is well into stage 3 and 8 in stage 4.  Really 6 trumps 7 and 8 as you should be out.  However, I do note my aggregate indicator noting a few times to buy.  Perhaps that would case a few whipsaws.

9 & 10.  These are on the climb out from the crash.  Knowing that we know now you'd want ot stay in here.  The 150 day MA only turns up at 9.  Are these false alarms?


With trader positions you'd be in and out quickly, I think on balance these danger indications would work for an investor.  But I need to take care saying that, as of course I'm likely to be biased for my own breadth overall scoring system.


RE: Stan Weinstein's Stage Analysis and Market Breadth - Technical Analysis - pcabc - 2020-03-22

Danger indication, another zoom in, 2006-7

Another zoom in.  Again not at a major crash to see if indications were false alarms or useful indications of deteriorating breadth:
   

1. Alert before an approximately 120-130 point drop, 9% drop peak to peak.   Useful, but would need good execution / low costs to be better off than riding the whole pullback.  However, considerably better than waiting until a few months later to sell.
2.  Useful indication that things are about to get worse.  This is the start of the stage 3 leading ot the stage 4 decline trhat includes the 2008 crash.
3. Spurious whipsaw?I'm not sure that it is foretelling the drop 6 weeks later.  It seems to be minor noise in both the Momentum Index and the % stocks above their 200 day EMAs.
4. Rolling into stage 4, no surprises.
5. False alarm, or expected as breadth is improving, but not enough yet?

I think this is useful, I just need to use it correctly.  I'm wondering if I need to add a filter that warnings are acted on only if asserted for 3 or more days to get rid of some of the whipsaws.  But the indicator is designed to be fast and given 1987 and definitely recent events it needs to be.  I think I won't mask the indicator but I will add a further flag if asserted for 3 days or more.


Stan Weinstein Stage Analysis and Market Breadth - isatrader - 2020-03-22

I've added a new post in the blog with the updated index charts, market breadth indicators and my commentary. See: https://www.stageanalysis.net/blog/21629/stock-market-indexes-update-market-breadth-charts-nearing-capitulation


RE: US Stock Market Breadth – Quickest 10% Decline From an All-Time High in History - malaguti - 2020-03-24

(2020-03-01, 08:35 PM)isatrader Wrote: This weeks moves in US stock market indexes and individual stocks confirmed what the market breadth indicators have been warning over the last month. However, the pullback has been much sharper than anyone could have predicted and so it looks like we've put in at least a medium term top imo, and not just a short term top, as there was a huge amount of technical damage done to the stock market indexes and individual stock charts, with almost half of the market having a breakdown of some kind this week. With stocks moving from Stage 2 straight into Stage 4. As many had closes well below their 30 week and 200 day MAs, and wiped out around half a years worth of gains or more.
Hi ISA, at what point would you have said, the move from stage 2 to 4 would be
would you say it was a certain percentage below the 30sma/200 day? if so, what percentage would you give..
i ask only in that its a good barometer for potentially automating this scenario and being able to quantify this measure would be extremely useful
on the daily, its pretty clear we could say it was at 284, there was a momentary pull back to the 200 and then dropped
on the weekly, its not so obvious. possibly at 302 where the last major support was broken and being again x percent below the 30
maybe even the fact that it  took out x number of weeks, would that have been a measure

welcome your thought process, even if there isnt necessarily a definitive answer


RE: US Stock Market Breadth – Quickest 10% Decline From an All-Time High in History - isatrader - 2020-03-24

(2020-03-24, 01:57 PM)malaguti Wrote: Hi ISA, at what point would you have said, the move from stage 2 to 4 would be
would you say it was a certain percentage below the 30sma/200 day? if so, what percentage would you give..
i ask only in that its a good barometer for potentially automating this scenario and being able to quantify this measure would be extremely useful
cheers

Generally I use the Weight of Evidence to try to determine the market stages as the indexes tend to lag. Primarily the NYSE and Nasdaq Composite Percentage of Stocks Above their 150 Day Moving Average is my main guide. Which is the 30 week moving average proxy.

I combine this with the major sectors with my sector breadth visual diagram which has a scale up the side. 

I take the average percentage from all of them, and then use the following scale:

Stage 1 & 3 are generally in the 40-60% range
Stage 2 is above 60%
Stage 4 is below 40%

This was a major part of the reason that I was suggesting a short term top in early February as the average was in the 50%-60% range, while the market was attempting to make new highs, and hence should have been in the high 60% to 70% range at least, which is normal in a strong bull advance.

See my sector breadth visual from the weekend of the 28th February and the current one

       


RE: US Stock Market Breadth – Quickest 10% Decline From an All-Time High in History - malaguti - 2020-03-24

(2020-03-24, 02:11 PM)isatrader Wrote:
(2020-03-24, 01:57 PM)malaguti Wrote: Hi ISA, at what point would you have said, the move from stage 2 to 4 would be
would you say it was a certain percentage below the 30sma/200 day? if so, what percentage would you give..
i ask only in that its a good barometer for potentially automating this scenario and being able to quantify this measure would be extremely useful
cheers

Generally I use the Weight of Evidence to try to determine the market stages as the indexes tend to lag. Primarily the NYSE and Nasdaq Composite Percentage of Stocks Above their 150 Day Moving Average is my main guide. Which is the 30 week moving average proxy.

I combine this with the major sectors with my sector breadth visual diagram which has a scale up the side. 

I take the average percentage from all of them, and then use the following scale:

Stage 1 & 3 are generally in the 40-60% range
Stage 2 is above 60%
Stage 4 is below 40%

See my sector breadth visual from the weekend of the 28th February and the current one

Perfect, love that answer! Thank you


RE: US Stock Market Breadth – Quickest 10% Decline From an All-Time High in History - malaguti - 2020-03-24

(2020-03-24, 02:20 PM)malaguti Wrote:
(2020-03-24, 02:11 PM)isatrader Wrote:
(2020-03-24, 01:57 PM)malaguti Wrote: Hi ISA, at what point would you have said, the move from stage 2 to 4 would be
would you say it was a certain percentage below the 30sma/200 day? if so, what percentage would you give..
i ask only in that its a good barometer for potentially automating this scenario and being able to quantify this measure would be extremely useful
cheers

Generally I use the Weight of Evidence to try to determine the market stages as the indexes tend to lag. Primarily the NYSE and Nasdaq Composite Percentage of Stocks Above their 150 Day Moving Average is my main guide. Which is the 30 week moving average proxy.

I combine this with the major sectors with my sector breadth visual diagram which has a scale up the side. 

I take the average percentage from all of them, and then use the following scale:

Stage 1 & 3 are generally in the 40-60% range
Stage 2 is above 60%
Stage 4 is below 40%

See my sector breadth visual from the weekend of the 28th February and the current one

Perfect, love that answer! Thank you

whats your take on individual stocks..take my recent investment SSON
there is no doubt it missed the transition from 2 to 3. there was a stop loss which got hit at 1258, but from a stage analysis. where would we have said we're possibly at 4?
I'm wondering in this example, we have 2 recent stop losses (1239) being taken out. thats possibly a good starting point
what do you think?


RE: US Stock Market Breadth – Quickest 10% Decline From an All-Time High in History - isatrader - 2020-03-24

(2020-03-24, 05:02 PM)malaguti Wrote: whats your take on individual stocks..take my recent investment SSON
there is no doubt it missed the transition from 2 to 3. there was a stop loss which got hit at 1258, but from a stage analysis. where would we have said we're possibly at 4?
I'm wondering in this example, we have 2 recent stop losses (1239) being taken out. thats possibly a good starting point
what do you think?

A close below a significant swing low on the weekly chart. Multiple weeks below the 200 day moving average is one I look out for as well, as most Stage 4 breakdowns occur below the 200 day MA or while moving through it if breaking down from higher. A breakdown below the weekly ichimoku cloud is also a good guide I've found. As well as the point where the 30 week MA turns lower. But it's generally not just one factor, as multiple things like these need to be present.

So with SSON the close on the 27th below the 200 day would have been a strong warning if it hadn't already hit the investor stop loss, which it should have imo. Then the follow through on the next day would have been the official Stage 4A point I think, as it had lost -16% or so in a week on heavy volume, broken through a swing low, and was well below the 200 day MA, and the 30 week MA had also turned down etc.